Skip to main content

Dr. Suzuki Began Playing at the Age of 20

Shinichi Suzuki did not start out as a violin teacher.  His father was a violin maker but he did not actually start learning how to play until the age of twenty.

To me, this is hugely significant when trying to understand a method of teaching that prides itself on being able to work with very young children.  The founder of this approach to teaching was not some child prodigy, he was an adult beginner.

I think this speaks volumes for the power of time and consistency.  I've lost count of how many times an adult has told me it's too late for them, they're too old to start.  Yes, there are advantages to starting a child young.  Areas of the brain are activated that would otherwise be sealed off.  But this doesn't mean an adult can't learn.

If a child starts music at the age of four and sticks with it, there is no question that they will be a decent musician by the age of twenty-four.  But let's be honest here: anyone who devotes twenty years of serious study to anything will certainly become proficient in the task.

The problem most adults have is an unwillingness to be a beginner.  A child is a beginner at just about everything so it's only natural that they should be allowed time to learn such a complex task.  As we age, we naturally lose that openness to learning.  By the time we are forty or fifty, society demands that we need to be an expert in something if we want to have a career.  This means we need to forsake trying to learn everything for the sake of learning one thing well.

This doesn't mean that we lost our ability to learn.  It means we lost our willingness to learn.  That's a big difference.  I think Suzuki is proof of the fact that anyone can learn how to play.  Learning must actually take place, however.  It is the learning that leads to knowing.  

Comments

  1. "The problem most adults have is an unwillingness to be a beginner." Yes, yes, and yes. I can't count the number of times I've heard that one! I've heard myself say it a little too quickly at times as well, to be honest. The willingness to learn, mess up, try again, fall on your face, and come back up again to succeed is essential to getting over the humps before you're good at just about anything.

    It always baffles me how old Suzuki started to play - inspiring, too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Plus the consistency of it. With young children, they have their parents there to constantly harp on/encourage them to keep going and make sure they stay on track. A child's musical training is very intense if you think about. They go to lessons every week, they regularly attend a group class and they're practicing every day. It's a rare thing for an adult to have the ability and patience to mimic that type of schedule.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Interview with Dr. Molly Gebrian on the Neuroscience Behind Block vs. Random Practice

Welcome to Rethinking Genius, Molly! Can you tell us a little about your background in teaching and neuroscience?

Thank you for inviting me to do this, Danielle! I was a Suzuki kid myself (I studied with David Einfeldt at the Hartt Suzuki Institute from the time I started at age 7), and I’ve done some Suzuki teacher training, but these days, I’m a college professor teaching at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire. I’ve been teaching for about 15 years, from 4-year old beginners, all the way up through graduate students. As far as neuroscience goes, I was a double-degree student at Oberlin College and Conservatory, majoring in viola performance and neuroscience. I had no plans to continue with neuroscience (it was just something I found fascinating, that I did for fun!), but when I got to New England Conservatory of Music for grad school, something was missing. My roommate at NEC, who had also been at Oberlin with me, participated in a study at Harvard looking at musicians’ versus …

The Illusion of Mastery

Dr. Molly Gebrian touched on a concept called "the illusion of mastery" in her Rethinking Genius interview.  Basically, it's what psychologists call it when you do something over and over again, giving yourself a false sense of mastery.

Wait... if you do something over and over again, shouldn't it be mastered?

Well, not always.

The true test of mastery is internalization.  If you're still having to follow the directions for how to make chicken, you haven't mastered chicken cooking.  Mastery means that you've cooked chicken so many times you're no longer worried about the basics.  It also means that you are confident enough in those basics that you are able to add extra elements with some degree of certainty.  For example, you know how the chicken should be cooked even after adding a sauce or extra seasoning.

In other words: you can complete the task under pressure.

The physical and psychological leap from the practice room to the stage is the biggest …